Tuesday, 21 of May of 2013

A Wide-Range Beacon/Bulletin Alternative

Message posted by W7ASA for KB1TCE

A fellow TAPRN member posed the question: “What would be a good way to
transmit brief alert messages or updates on a repetitive basis?”

Ideally this would be some kind of automated system that sends out a
status at regular intervals, thereby compensating for variations in
propagation and listening hours.

After discussing a number of possibilities and doing some on-air
testing, a few of us came to a general agreement that leveraging the HF
APRS system would provide a good solution.

Most hams are familiar with VHF APRS, used for tracking, search and
rescue, weather data reporting, simple messaging, etc. VHF, of course,
has limited range and is dependent upon digipeaters and the internet for
distance operation. Not what we’d want.

HF APRS by definition has much broader coverage. Like its VHF
counterpart, it can use the internet infrastructure via stations that
are tied to the internet (I-Gates). Also, like VHF APRS, HF APRS uses
common frequencies and it’s OK to run full auto, beaconing every 20-30
minutes. Signals might collide every now and then but the usage is low
enough that most transmissions will be in the clear.

The standard worldwide HF APRS band is 30 meters. Stations work with HF
packet and several sound card modes. For PSK and MFSK modes the center
frequency is 10,149.7 MHZ and the dial frequency is 10,147.6 USB (2100
Hz waterfall).

Two types of messages can be sent. The first is a periodic beacon that
includes the station call, specific or generalized lat/long info and
some text. The second is a message (67 characters max) that can be
addressed to a specific station call or to a group name.

To use HF APRS you need some software. The one that is applicable is
APRS Messenger, developed by Chris Moulding, G4HYG. It’s freeware and is
available for download at

http://www.crosscountrywireless.net/aprs_messenger.htm

There are no restrictions on who can download the program so non-hams
can use it for monitoring. A detailed description for set up is
available from http://wa8lmf.net/APRS_PSK63/.

For testing purposes, we have been sending messages to the group TAPRN.
(The group name can be anything up to 6 letters.) Here is an example,
pulled off of http://aprs.fi/?c=message&call=TAPRN

2012-07-31 01:18:03 UTC: KB1TCE-63>TAPRN: One active survey (water)

The message would probably be meaningless except for anyone who is
active on the BBS network and is aware that there are regular bulletins
and surveys. The person who is monitoring messages can either let his
radio listen when convenient or just go to the aprs.fi web site,
assuming that there is internet access.

>From Maine, the best 30 meter propagation (based on I-Gate hits) seems
to be in the late evening and early AM hours. That’s great as I could
just set my rig to transmit during those hours, given normal
circumstances. Just key in a message and let it run while I sleep.

We would really appreciate comments on this, including suggestions for
specific alert protocols or even better ideas.

EasyFreeAds Blog News Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon


Leave a comment


Comments RSS TrackBack 10 comments

  • John Harazda

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 17:02

    Well, since you asked! I would use something like FLDIGI running FLARQ. If we choose one of the more unusual modes like PSK 500-R using audio at 1,500Hz (the middle of the pass band) in beacon mode it will be easy for others to spot. Frequencies: one in 40 meters and one in 20 meters, depending on day or night. OLIVIA is very robust (as is PSK-500R). PSK-31 is too common to show a unique waveform.

    Why FLDIGI and FLARQ? They are simple enough for me to understand and work very well. These super-complicated programs really irk me!

    What to beacon? I probably won’t be putting out anything but my call sign. As to the text, I don’t know, but we stand to run afoul of the one way broadcast rules if we get too brave.

    Beacon under what conditions? A real mess like Katrina, anything less probably wouldn’t warrant it.


  • Steve

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 17:26

    Hadn’t really thought about Flarq although Fldigi would be attractive in some ways. As I understand Flarq it can send a limited number of beacons at intervals to a few minutes but it’s really meant as an attended p2p ARQ method and the beacon is to get the attention of the target station.

    For extended use, unattended, it would have to run on one of the 97.122 auto sub bands.

    I do find Flarq to be complex, more than APRS Messenger. For p2p ARQ hard to beat RMS Express/Winmor.

    Anyway, interesting comment.


  • Steve

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 17:33

    I should add, anyone who has an idea, there’s a bunch of us that would be willing to participate in testing.


  • werner

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 19:25

    Just a thought, you might be able to do the same thing with FLdigi. Set up a MACRO just for messaging and put a timer on it…


  • Steve

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 19:59

    Yup, that would work with the only issue being (as I mentioned) unattended operation. For APRS Messenger, the beacons can be set for various intervals. For the messages I am using an auto mouse keying program. I just enter the coordinates of the send button and set the time interval and number of repeats. Works pretty good. Every hour the cursor runs to the button and does a left click.

    Fldigi can run various scripts under Linux but the capabilities are much more modest in the Windows and Mac versions.


  • Jess

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 21:18

    The original intent or objective was mostly (all?) aimed at alerting bbs participants to a bulletin posting, thus giving them cause to run a connect to one of the BBS nodes. Are we proposing using APRS for any other messaging purpose? A beacon addressed to TAPRN dring actual chaos condx can be as cryptic as just “BULL posted”

    Using the beacon to alert to bbs bulletin posting augments the system; passing other message traffic via beacon dilutes the effectiveness of the bbs system and potentially leaves some out of the loop.


  • John Harazda

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 21:54

    Oh! I misunderstood! I thought you meant like “Help, these guys shooting at me have red stars on their hats” That’s why I said I would only send out my call sign. Sorry, some reactions die hard.

    The FLARQ I have has a beacon delay of up to 3,600 seconds. Personally I have never used FLARQ except into my dummy load for practice, but it seems ok. I’ve used the other ARQ modes like G-TOR, AMTOR, PACTOR and Clover -2. I’ve used Clover 2 on the commercial bands and seen Pactor-3. Both are wicked, but FLDIGI is “free”!

    Frankly, I’m kinda bored with PSK-31 and just exchanging macros and wall paper. Let’s keep these thoughts going. I’m going to be watching the bands to see what transpires in the next week with the hurricane. November should prove interesting too.


  • Steve

    in August 23rd, 2012 @ 23:13

    Jess has it correct although it could be for very general alerting purposes not specific to the BBS network. However, in all cases it would be an indicator for people to check further: new postings on the BBS, schedule change for a net, a station is down, etc. Here for example is the current feed off of http://aprs.fi/?c=message&call=TAPRN&limit=50

    2012-08-23 20:21:28 UTC: W7ASA-1>TAPRN: VIRGINIA // Outside tending the mini-farm. 73 de Ray
    2012-08-23 20:50:13 UTC: W7ASA-1>TAPRN: VIRGINIA / TESTING DIGIPEAT
    2012-08-23 22:52:18 UTC: WB5PDD-63>TAPRN: TEST
    2012-08-23 23:00:21 UTC: W7ASA-1>TAPRN: VIRGINIA / NEAR REEDVILLE, VA.
    2012-08-24 03:33:21 UTC: W7ASA-1>TAPRN: TEST BULLETIN.

    These guys are doing better at hitting an i-gate tonight than I am.


  • Steve

    in August 24th, 2012 @ 07:02

    John – I’ve only used Flarq on the air once and the results were mixed. One of the Fldigi/NBEMS message boards tried to get a handle on what emcomm groups were using Flarq. The answer was basically none. Winmor P2P is IMHO much easier to work with.

    As for PSK31, it’s a great entry mode as a lot of people use it. I quickly got tired of the hit and run aspect. There are some folks in this area who do laid back chats with Olivia 8/500 and 16/500. Much more fun and a QSO can last a long time. The numerous NBEMS nets are also a great place to practice Olivia/MT63 and traffic handling with Flmsg. Over the past year and a half, Flmsg has undergone an incredible amount of development.


  • Steve

    in September 5th, 2012 @ 17:28

    I will have to add that any message transmissions have to abide by the Part 97 regulations, just in case that isn’t obvious. Pointing out the availability of a bulletin on the BBS or calling up a net at xxxx hrs would conform.